Sketch: On Occupy Wall Street
Harcourt’s article [1] describes Occupy Wall Street as a new and deconstructive movement in the form of political, rather than civil, disobedience. Drawing his conceptual framework from Foucault’s analyses of critique, Harcourt states that by refusing to identify anything ordinarily associated with resistance (i.e., unified reform agenda or demand; political position or party; ideology [34], an enemy [47], and even a leader [39]), Occupy becomes an embodiment of a new paradigm (in terms of worldview and grammar) that purely resists, in Giddens’s framework, the entire structure (in terms of rules and resources, i.e., the “rationality, discourse and strategies” [34]) of the political itself. This rejection “not only [of] our civil structure of laws and political institutions but [of] politics writ large” (34) is achieved in multiple ways and levels. One, it achieved a leaderless stance that allows for the unified plurality of political persuasions (41) against the domina...